| Keywords:
technology, social activism, smart mobs
References: 'SmartMobs'
by Howard Rheingold, Wired News, The Feature, Corante
Acknowledgements:
Brandon Jourdan, Indymedia.org
Sam Gregory, Witness.org
Heather Greer, ITP
Anthony Townsend, NYCWireless
Marianne Petit, ITP
Date: April 2004
|
|
SCENARIO PLANNING
The Internet and Cell Phones as Platforms for the Development
of Grassroots Movements and Democracy Online
“We are now in a situation similar
to that of late 15th and 16th Century Europe. Then, the spread of
knowledge triggered by Gutenberg’s printing press both helped
to drive and was supported by, a continent-wide rivalry of religious
ideas. Now, the Internet has become both the fuel and the vehicle
for a dramatic spread in democracy, intensifying demand for and
supporting the spread of genuinely transparent and participatory
and more efficient systems of government at both the national and
global levels”, Mark Malloch Brown, United Nations Development
Programme
In 2004, the expansion of the internet and the development
of social networks through technology has allowed the civil society
to organize in ways that were not possible before. Thanks to technology,
the citizenship has the power to make its opinion be heard louder
and clearer, and new grassroots movements are beginning to influence
the way that politics is made.
During the last years social awareness of political issues has materialized
in a series of ways. Since the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle
in 1999 we have attended the development of a global justice movement,
that is represented by organizations such as United
For Peace and Justice, ActForChange,
Global Exchange,
Human Rights Watch, GlobalizeThis
or Electronic Frontier Foundation,
but also we have seen the birth of new activist media such as Indymedia.org,
DemocracyNow.org or Witness.org
that provide an alternative point of view to corporate media and have
been boosted by the conglomeration of the mainstream media.
Citizens have followed on their side starting to use the internet to play
an active role in politics, through initiatives like MoveOn.org
or Motivados.org,
two online collectives that have run their own candidates in national
elections in the United States and Spain, respectively.
But lets explore some facts.
Seattle, 1999. ca. 40.000 people representing more than 100 groups
organized a non-violent protest at the meeting of the World Trade
Organization. The Web and e-mail lists helped to spread the word
across the globe in what is considered to be the first landmark
in global mobilization orchestrated thanks to technology. A bunch
of journalists, aware that the corporate media would offer a biased
vision of the event, decided to set up an additional information
channel through the internet, Indymedia.org.
The website got between 1,5 and 2 million hits during the first
weeks. Currently Indymedia is very well established and growing,
and its reporters use a peer-to-peer video-sharing service to transmit
broadcast-quality video to television stations and other activists.
They also set up wireless networks and stream audio recordings over
the Internet for rebroadcast on radio stations.
Manila, January 2001. President Joseph Estrada became the first
head of state in history to lose power to a smart mob. Over 1 million
people, mobilized and coordinated by text messaging demonstrated
during four days to bring down the government. Mobile phones showed
the power of collective action.
Spain, 2001. The political experiment Another
Democracy Is Possible, is born from the conjunction of
the online platform Motivados.org (motivated), and WebEspiral.org
(the spiral web) . Another Democracy is Possible runs in five regional
elections and they present 22 candidates to local elections.
USA, Spring 2002. The Institute
for Politics, Democracy & the Internet is created at the
George Washington University with the mission to promote the development
of U.S. online politics in a manner that increases citizen participation
and upholds democratic values.
Nigeria, 2002- 2003, 10 millions of signatures collected by Amnesty
International through their online campaign Amnesty for Nigeria
managed to stop the stoning to death of Safiya Hussaini and Amina
Lawal arguably accused by the sharia (Islamic law) of adultery in
irregular trials.
The World, February 15th, 2003, over 15 millions of people all over
the world marched in the streets to say 'no' to the war in Iraq.
Independent online media and chain e-mails exchanged by peers help
organize global demonstrations.
USA, 2003, Howard Dean rises $11 million during a six-month period,
to run for the presidential elections. The website MoveOn.org
boosted him as a candidate for the democrats and sets another
landmark in the involvement of civil society in politics.
Spain, March 12-13th 2004, after the terrorist attack that killed
200 people and wounded over 1,500 in Madrid on March 11th, 5.000
people gather spontaneously in front of the offices of the party
in the government to ask for information about who carried out the
attacks. SMS and e-mails were the basic tools to organize the protests.
These are just a bunch of collective actions that
took place favoured by technology, in which the internet helped
people organize and get together in order to achieve a common goal.
All of them were mostly grassroots movements, but the importance
of online actions is transcending. The BBC understood it in 2003
when they decided to launch the website iCan
to fight against political apathy of the Britons. And there are
more initiatives to come.
Amateur enthusiasts are connecting small communities all over the
world to the internet, and developing meshnetworking,
peer to peer and decentralized wireless networks, along with software,
such as WASTE,
to make these networks private.
In developing countries, where mobile phones are more extended than
computers, a boom of mobile phones uses will follow. But also, there
are institutions such as the United
Nations Development Programme that promote the use of technology
in these countries, and organizations such as Witness.org
bring video equipment to oppressed populations and train them to
tape videos that are presented in international courts as legal
evidence of political abuse.
So far, people have mostly mobilized when faced
to crisis, but in 2012, with the natural development and extension
of information and communication technologies, the future may have
unfolded in different ways.
1. Utopian scenario.
The use of technology has extended and reaches a large enough segment
of population so that the organization of civil society can be made
online. Public institutions develop online platforms to allow citizenship
to participate actively in the decision-making process, and simultaneously,
independent groups set up information and organization networks
that are accessible through different kinds of devices.
Independent media disseminate contributions of spontaneous
journalists and make public the information corporate media ignore
to denounce abuses and misbehavior of political and economic actors
mainly. Civilians become politically aware and democratically responsible
and exercise control over their rulers through online platforms.
Wireless technologies extend the internet to regions
with difficult access and cell phones bring grassroots organization
to countries with a low rate of computers. Governments and industry
listen to the voice of the streets and truly represent their countries.
2. Super-Police
scenario. Citizen activism increases and becomes
annoying to governments, that try to control the organization of
the civil society by increasing the monitoring and control of electronic
communications. Carnivore
and Echelon
initiatives become usual claiming for the need to control terrorist
and ultra revolutionary groups. Police forces are deployed in the
streets to prevent smart mobs. Freedom of speech is censored. Encryption
protocols multiply.
In this scenario, some groups express their frustration
through violent actions. The streets become a battle field between
security forces and civilians. When groups demonstrate pacifically
police reacts violently to dissolve the concentrations.
3. Democracy goes
online. Attending to the success of the electronic
organization of civil society, the online scene transcends grassroots
movements and theres a development of online political parties.
Electronic vote spreads out and governments carry out specific online
consultations.
4. Urged political
involvement. Politically apathetic scenario. People
continue to use the internet to communicate with their peers but
the majority of the population stays away from political groups.
The civil society only engages in politics when faced to crisis
situations, and then using mostly portable devices to organize mobilizations
on the fly. Smart mobs become actions to expect. Governments try
to control them and pay attention to their claims according to the
success of the mobilization.
5. Trivial mobs.
Smart mobs organized by electronic means become popular. People
get together with many different aims, not only political, so that
grassroots meetings end up being common and don't have any major
impact.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Rheingold, Howard, Smart
Mobs. The Next Social Revolution, Basic Books, Sept. 2002
Asaravala, Amit, Todays Tech-Dependent Activists, Wired
News, Aug. 28, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282.60180,00.html
Batista, Elisa, Bloggers Report Alt News From G8, Wired News,
Jun. 04, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,590086,00.html
Boyd, Andrew, The Web Rewires the Movement, The Nation, Aug.
4, 2003
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mtml?I=20030804&s=boyd
Borland, John, 'Telecom: Is Wi-Fi the missing link?', CNET News.com, Feb.
4, 2003
http://news.com.com/2009-1033-982113.html?tag=techdirt
Kahney, Leander, Internet Stokes Anti-War
Movement, Wired News, Jan. 21, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,57310,00.html
Kahney, Leander, Web Antidote for Political Apathy,
Wired News, May 05, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,58715,00.html
Kahney, Leander, WTO: Were Talking Online, Wired
News, Dec. 03,1999
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32844,00.html
Malloch Brown, Mark, Democracy and the Information Revolution,
Choices, the United Nations Development Programme Magazine, Sep.
2001
http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org/content/stories/index.cfm?key=192
Quain, John R., As the RIAA tightens the legal noose, music
pirates add WASTE, a powerful new tool, to their arsenals,
Popular Science, Oct. 2003
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/internet/article/0,12543,487363,00.html
Rheingold, Howard, 'Wireless Public Servants Parachute Over the
Digital Divide', The Feature, Aug. 2, 2002
http://www.thefeature.com/article?articleid=15576
Scheeres, Julia, Pics Worth a Thousand
Protests, Wired News, Oct. 17, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,60828,00.html
Shirky, Clay, Is Social Software Bad for the Dean Campaign?,
Many 2 Many, a group weblog on social software, Jan. 26, 2004
http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/01/26/is_social_software_bad_for_the_dean_campaign.php
WASTE - reliable privacy? Smart Mobs, Nov. 16, 2003
http://www.smartmobs.com/archives/002046.html
|