cellphone applications
digital product design
video
scenario planning >>
interactive pastimes
participatory media
physical computing
writing
web
graphic thoughts

Technology and social activism
Migrations

   

Keywords: technology, social activism, smart mobs

References: 'SmartMobs' by Howard Rheingold, Wired News, The Feature, Corante

Acknowledgements:
Brandon Jourdan, Indymedia.org
Sam Gregory, Witness.org
Heather Greer, ITP
Anthony Townsend, NYCWireless
Marianne Petit, ITP

Date: April 2004

 

 

 

SCENARIO PLANNING

The Internet and Cell Phones as Platforms for the Development of Grassroots Movements and Democracy Online

“We are now in a situation similar to that of late 15th and 16th Century Europe. Then, the spread of knowledge triggered by Gutenberg’s printing press both helped to drive and was supported by, a continent-wide rivalry of religious ideas. Now, the Internet has become both the fuel and the vehicle for a dramatic spread in democracy, intensifying demand for and supporting the spread of genuinely transparent and participatory and more efficient systems of government at both the national and global levels”, Mark Malloch Brown, United Nations Development Programme

In 2004, the expansion of the internet and the development of social networks through technology has allowed the civil society to organize in ways that were not possible before. Thanks to technology, the citizenship has the power to make its opinion be heard louder and clearer, and new grassroots movements are beginning to influence the way that politics is made.

During the last years social awareness of political issues has materialized in a series of ways. Since the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1999 we have attended the development of a global justice movement, that is represented by organizations such as United For Peace and Justice, ActForChange, Global Exchange, Human Rights Watch, GlobalizeThis or Electronic Frontier Foundation, but also we have seen the birth of new activist media such as Indymedia.org, DemocracyNow.org or Witness.org that provide an alternative point of view to corporate media and have been boosted by the conglomeration of the mainstream media.

Citizens have followed on their side starting to use the internet to play an active role in politics, through initiatives like MoveOn.org or Motivados.org, two online collectives that have run their own candidates in national elections in the United States and Spain, respectively.

But let’s explore some facts.

Seattle, 1999. ca. 40.000 people representing more than 100 groups organized a non-violent protest at the meeting of the World Trade Organization. The Web and e-mail lists helped to spread the word across the globe in what is considered to be the first landmark in global mobilization orchestrated thanks to technology. A bunch of journalists, aware that the corporate media would offer a biased vision of the event, decided to set up an additional information channel through the internet, Indymedia.org. The website got between 1,5 and 2 million hits during the first weeks. Currently Indymedia is very well established and growing, and its reporters use a peer-to-peer video-sharing service to transmit broadcast-quality video to television stations and other activists. They also set up wireless networks and stream audio recordings over the Internet for rebroadcast on radio stations.

Manila, January 2001. President Joseph Estrada became the first head of state in history to lose power to a smart mob. Over 1 million people, mobilized and coordinated by text messaging demonstrated during four days to bring down the government. Mobile phones showed the power of collective action.

Spain, 2001. The political experiment ‘Another Democracy Is Possible’, is born from the conjunction of the online platform Motivados.org (‘motivated’), and WebEspiral.org (the spiral web) . Another Democracy is Possible runs in five regional elections and they present 22 candidates to local elections.

USA, Spring 2002. The Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet is created at the George Washington University with the mission to promote the development of U.S. online politics in a manner that increases citizen participation and upholds democratic values.

Nigeria, 2002- 2003, 10 millions of signatures collected by Amnesty International through their online campaign Amnesty for Nigeria managed to stop the stoning to death of Safiya Hussaini and Amina Lawal arguably accused by the sharia (Islamic law) of adultery in irregular trials.

The World, February 15th, 2003, over 15 millions of people all over the world marched in the streets to say 'no' to the war in Iraq. Independent online media and chain e-mails exchanged by peers help organize global demonstrations.

USA, 2003, Howard Dean rises $11 million during a six-month period, to run for the presidential elections. The website MoveOn.org boosted him as a candidate for the democrats and sets another landmark in the involvement of civil society in politics.

Spain, March 12-13th 2004, after the terrorist attack that killed 200 people and wounded over 1,500 in Madrid on March 11th, 5.000 people gather spontaneously in front of the offices of the party in the government to ask for information about who carried out the attacks. SMS and e-mails were the basic tools to organize the protests.

These are just a bunch of collective actions that took place favoured by technology, in which the internet helped people organize and get together in order to achieve a common goal. All of them were mostly grassroots movements, but the importance of online actions is transcending. The BBC understood it in 2003 when they decided to launch the website iCan to fight against political apathy of the Britons. And there are more initiatives to come.

Amateur enthusiasts are connecting small communities all over the world to the internet, and developing ‘meshnetworking’, peer to peer and decentralized wireless networks, along with software, such as WASTE, to make these networks private.

In developing countries, where mobile phones are more extended than computers, a boom of mobile phones uses will follow. But also, there are institutions such as the United Nations Development Programme that promote the use of technology in these countries, and organizations such as Witness.org bring video equipment to oppressed populations and train them to tape videos that are presented in international courts as legal evidence of political abuse.

So far, people have mostly mobilized when faced to crisis, but in 2012, with the natural development and extension of information and communication technologies, the future may have unfolded in different ways.


1. Utopian scenario. The use of technology has extended and reaches a large enough segment of population so that the organization of civil society can be made online. Public institutions develop online platforms to allow citizenship to participate actively in the decision-making process, and simultaneously, independent groups set up information and organization networks that are accessible through different kinds of devices.

Independent media disseminate contributions of spontaneous journalists and make public the information corporate media ignore to denounce abuses and misbehavior of political and economic actors mainly. Civilians become politically aware and democratically responsible and exercise control over their rulers through online platforms.

Wireless technologies extend the internet to regions with difficult access and cell phones bring grassroots organization to countries with a low rate of computers. Governments and industry listen to the voice of the streets and truly represent their countries.

2. Super-Police scenario. Citizen activism increases and becomes annoying to governments, that try to control the organization of the civil society by increasing the monitoring and control of electronic communications. Carnivore and Echelon initiatives become usual claiming for the need to control terrorist and ultra revolutionary groups. Police forces are deployed in the streets to prevent smart mobs. Freedom of speech is censored. Encryption protocols multiply.

In this scenario, some groups express their frustration through violent actions. The streets become a battle field between security forces and civilians. When groups demonstrate pacifically police reacts violently to dissolve the concentrations.

3. Democracy goes online. Attending to the success of the electronic organization of civil society, the online scene transcends grassroots movements and there’s a development of online political parties. Electronic vote spreads out and governments carry out specific online consultations.

4. Urged political involvement. Politically apathetic scenario. People continue to use the internet to communicate with their peers but the majority of the population stays away from political groups. The civil society only engages in politics when faced to crisis situations, and then using mostly portable devices to organize mobilizations on the fly. Smart mobs become actions to expect. Governments try to control them and pay attention to their claims according to the success of the mobilization.

5. Trivial mobs. Smart mobs organized by electronic means become popular. People get together with many different aims, not only political, so that grassroots meetings end up being common and don't have any major impact.

 

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

 

Rheingold, Howard, ‘Smart Mobs. The Next Social Revolution’, Basic Books, Sept. 2002


Asaravala, Amit, ‘Today’s Tech-Dependent Activists’, Wired News, Aug. 28, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282.60180,00.html

Batista, Elisa, ‘Bloggers Report Alt News From G8’, Wired News, Jun. 04, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,590086,00.html

Boyd, Andrew, ‘The Web Rewires the Movement’, The Nation, Aug. 4, 2003
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mtml?I=20030804&s=boyd

Borland, John, 'Telecom: Is Wi-Fi the missing link?', CNET News.com, Feb. 4, 2003
http://news.com.com/2009-1033-982113.html?tag=techdirt

Kahney, Leander, ‘Internet Stokes Anti-War Movement, Wired News, Jan. 21, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,57310,00.html

Kahney, Leander, ‘Web Antidote for Political Apathy’, Wired News, May 05, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,58715,00.html

Kahney, Leander, ‘WTO: We’re Talking Online’, Wired News, Dec. 03,1999
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32844,00.html

Malloch Brown, Mark, ‘Democracy and the Information Revolution’, Choices, the United Nations Development Programme Magazine, Sep. 2001
http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org/content/stories/index.cfm?key=192

Quain, John R., ‘As the RIAA tightens the legal noose, music pirates add WASTE, a powerful new tool, to their arsenals’, Popular Science, Oct. 2003
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/internet/article/0,12543,487363,00.html

Rheingold, Howard, 'Wireless Public Servants Parachute Over the Digital Divide', The Feature, Aug. 2, 2002
http://www.thefeature.com/article?articleid=15576

Scheeres, Julia, ‘Pics Worth a Thousand Protests’, Wired News, Oct. 17, 2003
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,60828,00.html

Shirky, Clay, ‘Is Social Software Bad for the Dean Campaign?’, Many 2 Many, a group weblog on social software, Jan. 26, 2004
http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/01/26/is_social_software_bad_for_the_dean_campaign.php

‘WASTE - reliable privacy?’ Smart Mobs, Nov. 16, 2003
http://www.smartmobs.com/archives/002046.html